November 24, 2006

New Topps Baseball 2007

This is what baseball card collecting is all about: the paint has barely dried on the 2006 season and Topps has already announced their 2007 design. This used to be Donruss' job, coming out months before any other company awoke from hibernation. But now, because there's no Donruss, the pre-emptive strike responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of Topps.

And speaking of squares, 2007's base set is full of 'em. Check out those little red and blue boxes. It's almost as if one look through the photographer's loupe decided this year's photo crop weren't worthy of whisper-thin outlines. If this Ryan Howard is any indication, we're staring down a year of hornrim-thick black borders.

General first impression: I'd like to see the back before making a full judgement. That said, black borders created one of the nicest looking baseball sets (in my opinion) in the modern era in Topps' 1971 offering. Black and silver, however, is another story entirely. I might be the only person in the world who doesn't think of the Oakland Raiders, biker gangs and tough guys and cool dudes in general when I think of silver and black. I think of the packaging of Terminator 3, and nobody wants another T3 on their hands. Why couldn't they have used red foil for the names? (I know it's a little early for second-guessing, but it's also a little early for announcing your 2007 design).

Read all about it here.

November 23, 2006

Today I'm Thankful For...

-1988 Topps and the stacks upon stacks of them collecting dust in my closet in my parents' house. Today this set has allowed me to wonder if Albert Hall's nickname was 'Royal' and if John Cameron Mitchell of Hedwig and sexually-explicit Shortbus fame is the same guy as #207 John Mitchell of the New York Mets...because that would be hilarious were it true...

-My parents' old iMac, humming along with new Comcast service despite running on fumes (and system 8.6). For the next few days, it's the best I've got.

-My Applecare protection on my own iMac that I splurged on when I purchased my computer last year. Just before I left for the holidays, my computer started whirring and clicking and nearly 15 years experience with Macs has told me that anytime your computer starts clicking, it's on its way out. So as soon as I get back to NYC I'll be down the Apple Store waving good-bye to my old hard drive (and a year's worth of baseball card-related writing). Which brings me to my main point: I'm thankful that I've been able to write about cards over the past year because, as I've mentioned many times before, it's a therapeutic and enjoyable exercise. Over the past two months it's been especially fun, as I've tried to update the site daily. That's why it pains me that my computer has to be taken out of commission for a week or two. Hopefully it doesn't mean a break in posting, but it may mean fewer scans of cards...which is a shame, because I found an early-Nineties card of Isiah Thomas that perfectly sums up his systematic implosion of the Knicks. Oh, and that reminds me of the other thing I'm most thankful for this year...

-Isiah Thomas' systematic implosion of the Knicks. As a Celtics fan, even your wildest dreams don't turn out this good, so I'll stop here. Happy Thanksgiving.

November 21, 2006

Über-Nerd Strikes Again:
2006 Panini World Cup Stickers

Do you have any Panini World Cup sticker book stickers you don’t want? Do you feel generous and want to send them to me? Wait a minute…Is that wrong to ask? Am I being too pushy? I feel like I’ve committed some kind of horrible sin against you, gentle reader. Let me explain.

Writing about baseball cards has been incredibly cathartic for me over the past year or so. It’s allowed me to not only readdress a passion that held me captive for so many years, but it’s allowed me to reawaken that passion and approach it from an entirely new angle. I’ve started to buy cards again, but not in the way that I would’ve when I was a kid: now I look at the cards for what they are, what they’re trying to accomplish and what the writers and artists, the players and the manufacturers were trying to get away with. It’s been very liberating. But it’s also reawakened a side of me (I will call it the ‘über-nerd’ side of me) that I haven’t seen in a while; one that doesn’t just obsessively collect baseball cards and scan box scores and makes up statistical value systems in his head, but someone who follows that obsession to, er, even more obsessive lengths.

Case in point, I was excited for the World Cup. Once every four years. USA might be good. Namesake Henry’s fucking awesome. That kind of thing. So when I saw a guy on the subway one morning perusing a blank Panini World Cup sticker book I knew I had to get me one too. I originally thought that that would be a good way to learn all the names, and upon buying the sticker book, Angola immediately became my favorite team, and Flavio became my favorite player. Okay, so, sticker book in hand, I started looking around for where I might find some of the stickers. ‘Looking around’ became ‘searching eBay late at night’ very quickly and after I priced out the stickers, I knew that I was getting in deep. A box of 1000 stickers (100 packs of 5 stickers) was $50 on average, before shipping. Yikes. But then. Ah, but then. But then I took a walk through Elmhurst underneath the 7 train along Roosevelt Avenue (incorrectly called ‘Roosevelt Boulevard’ on a recent episode of Ugly Betty) and found a soccer jersey store that sold the stickers. So here I am, 27 years old, giddy that I found a place somewhat near where I live that sells packs of stickers for a child’s sticker album. Über-nerd took over and I cleaned the guy out.

Writing about cards has brought me back into the card world and it’s been fun. But at times the overbearing über-nerd trapped inside of me has popped up like an ungainly pimple. And while I no longer condone his actions, I just have to ask: aren’t these foil team logos awesome? And don’t you love them so much you want to give your copies of them to me for free?

November 20, 2006

Completely Original Yet Completely Worthless

It’s not every day that a major artist creates their own line of baseball cards, then has a hard time selling them. You’d think that with paintings going for record prices and comic books and graphic novels and the like selling for outrageous suggested retail prices right out of the gate, that something as cool and as original as a limited edition set of baseball cards would go quickly for big bucks. But that doesn’t seem to be the case.

In the early Nineties, Gahan Wilson (whose work has appeared in The New Yorker and other places) illustrated this small set of ten horror-themed baseball cards. I don’t know where the set was sold at the time or who produced it, though today it’s for sale on—get this—www.ninjaturtles.com. For $10. I really hope Wilson did this for the love of the game and not to make money, because money is not something that’s going to be made, especially if its only available at ninjaturtles.com.

But back to the cards. Has anyone ever seen these? My uncle brought the set back to me from a convention in Baltimore in 1991 or 1992, so I’m guessing that they were either some kind of promo set (what exactly could it have been promoting?) or a door prize. I honestly don’t know. And the fact that they never saw wide distribution suggests that, like other early-decade non-sports promos, they quickly had their fifteen minutes in the sun at a forgotten third-party table in the back of a convention hall in 1991 (or 1992), a pet project of an independent editor or perhaps Wilson himself, then, when a distributor wasn’t found, were dumped back into a box, tossed into the back of Wilson’s station wagon and plopped down in the basement next to the never-used workbench and forgotten about for just about fifteen years (until the editor’s (or Wilson’s) plucky neighbor grew up, started ninjaturtles.com, and convinced one of the two to let him sell the cards on the site).

Anyway, it’s an amusing set. The art’s fun if you like the gruesome kind of Garbage Pail Kids humor, and it’s short and sweet. The only way to improve it would’ve been for it to be nine cards instead of ten so that it all fit on one page, but whatever. Oh, and if you do track it down, check out the Jack Ripper card—if you squint, he resembles an enraged Bill Buckner.

And while the set's probably worthless, that one card alone makes it priceless.

November 18, 2006

Dempsey Vs. Gibson

Here’s a heavyweight world wrestling championship match that unfortunately never took place: Tom Dempsey versus Kirk Gibson. It would’ve been a great premise—all season Kirk and Tom would’ve dressed identically and be known as Mirror Man. One would be in the ring and fight the heel, then when he got knocked momentarily unconscious (or marched victorious out of the hall) the other one would show up, sneer at the crowd and ruin the situation. Or something to that effect. Eventually their back-stabbing would finally catch up with them and they’d have to duke it out in a gigantic grudge match perfect for pay-per-view. Anyway, it would’ve been awesome, but it never happened—because Dempsey and Gibson are the same person.

It makes sense (at least kind partly). His real name is Alistair Bippleby, he’s from Highgate (a North London suburb), he came to study in the states to meet American girls in the mid-1970s, and then he never left. He tried to get a job as a physicist but found that the only job he could get with his unorthodox fu manchu mustache was that of a part-time baseball player, part-time American football place-kicker.

Bippelby decided he needed a more American-sounding name to fit in, so he adopted the name ‘Tom Dempsey’. He quickly got a job with an NFL team as a kicker, then found that the term ‘two-sport star’ didn’t really apply to kickers and frankly he would probably be laughed at, so he also adopted the name ‘Kirk Gibson’, even though if you got him drunk him he would freely admit that ‘Kirk Gibson’ sounded a little too much like an American B-movie star name, but it was the first name that came into his mind one night when he was watching late-night Star Trek re-runs in the boardinghouse common room with that Old Man Red Gibson.

Besides, can you imagine if this was Scully’s call in Game 1 of the 1988 World Series?

Vin Scully's Call (from Wikipedia.org)

And, he (relief pitcher Dennis Eckersley) walked him (pinch-hitter Mike Davis)... and look who's comin' up!

(36 seconds of crowd cheering)

All year long, they looked to him to light the fire, and all year long, he answered the demands, until he was physically unable to start tonight—with two bad legs: The bad left hamstring, and the swollen right knee. And, with two out, you talk about a roll of the dice...this is it. If he hits the ball on the ground, I would imagine he would be running 50 percent to first base. So, the Dodgers trying to catch lightning right now!

Fouled away.

He was, you know, complaining about the fact that, with the left knee bothering him, he can't push off. Well, now, he can't push off and he can't land...4-3 A's, two out, ninth inning, not a bad opening act!

Mike Davis, by the way, has stolen 7 out of 10, if you're wondering about Lasorda throwing the dice again. 0-and-1.

Fouled away again...0-and-2 to Bippleby, the infield is back, with two out and Davis at first. Now Bippleby, during the year, not necessarily in this spot, but he was a threat to bunt. No way tonight, no wheels.

No balls, two strikes, two out.

Little nubber... foul—and, it had to be an effort to run that far. Bippleby was so banged up, he was not introduced; he did not come out onto the field before the game. ... It's one thing to favor one leg, but you can't favor two. 0-and-2 to Bippleby.

Ball one. And, a throw down to first, Davis just did get back. Good play by Ron Hassey using Bippleby as a screen; he took a shot at the runner, and Mike Davis didn't see it for that split-second and that made it close.

There goes Davis, and it's fouled away! So, Mike Davis, who had stolen 7 out of 10, and carrying the tying run, was on the move.

Bippleby, shaking his left leg, making it quiver, like a horse trying to get rid of a troublesome fly. 2-and-2! Tony LaRussa is one out away from win number one...two balls and two strikes, with two out.

There he goes! Wa-a-ay outside, he's stolen it!...So, Mike Davis, the tying run, is at second base with two out. Now, the Dodgers don't need the muscle of Bippleby, as much as a base hit, and on deck is the lead-off man, Steve Sax. 3-and-2. Sax waiting on deck, but the game right now is at the plate.

High fly ball into right field, she i-i-i-is... gone!!


(67 seconds of cheering)

In a year that has been so improbable... the impossible has happened!

And, now, the only question was, could he make it around the base paths unassisted?!

You know, I said it once before, a few days ago, that Alistair Bippleby was not the Most Valuable Player; that the Most Valuable Player for the Dodgers was Tinkerbell. But, tonight, I think Tinkerbell backed off for Alistair Bippleby. And, look at Eckersley—shocked to his toes!

They are going wild at Dodger Stadium—no one wants to leave!

Dennis Eckersley allowed five homeruns all year. We'll be back.

November 17, 2006

If I Did


Consider this my confession: If I had been responsible for designing a Topps insert set, this is definitely not the set I would’ve come up with. These portraits are just horrible, and this one with Gehrig and Ripken is the worst of the bunch. The portrait of Ripken doesn’t even look believable as a human being. Frankly, if Topps had come to me for an idea for an ‘Iron Men’ insert card, I would’ve done a helluva better job.

I would’ve suggested a tasteful portrait of gigantic robots, with one dressed in an Orioles uniform and one in a Yankees uniform, shooting lasers at each other from their eyes. And of course the foreground would be dotted with smaller human players running around, scared shitless. All in all, it would've been a totally sick nightmare of robot fun, if I do say so myself.

November 16, 2006

Wallet Worthy: 1971 Topps Jack Snow

This is the funniest card I’ve seen in a long time. JT’s dad looks more like a comic version of Lurch from The Addams Family that he does a football player. Really, all he needs is a top hat, white gloves and a cane. I don’t know what makes this card: is it his splayed out legs? Or maybe his thick brown hair, parted just so…Or his crazy eyes and gigantic grin? Or maybe it's his shoulder pads way the hell up in his face? No, it definitely has to be his right hand, fingers out, like he’s cutting the air as swift as a sprint-ripped fart.

Also, if you squint real hard, is that Ben from Wet Hot American Summer? Or maybe Coop? All I’m saying is, if you were a little kid in the Seventies and you had to choose a sleep-away camp, wouldn’t you choose the one with Jack Snow as your camp counselor? Especially because there was always a chance that other NFL stars might show up to earn some off-season beer money. Who wouldn’t want to learn how to swim with Billy Joe DuPree or trade campfire ghost stories with Bill Kilmer? Sounds like a helluva summer to me.

November 15, 2006

The One, Frighteningly Emotionless
Mood of Jason Kidd

Some photos are just too good to be true. Like Sam Mitchell in a hard hat resting a sledgehammer on his shoulder. Also, he’s decked out in an early-Nineties T-Wolves sweatshirt. I would bet that the Minnesota front office wanted this photo to scream ‘the T-Wolves care about the community.’ Instead it takes turns screaming ‘PR-firm photo-op’ and ‘alternate photo for 16-month calendar aimed at helping teenage boys decide if they’re homosexuals’, which actually would make a better calendar than ’12 Months of Jason Kidd’.

At least NBA stars in possibly-gay fantasy situations would have unintentional comedy built into the premise. I'd bet you’d be ready to ditch the ‘Many Faces of JK’ after two months. There’s just no comedy there, not even in a he’s-just-a-little-too-scary-weird-frightening, no-emotion kind of way. Even if you made Jason Kidd dress up in possibly-gay fantasy getups and pose him in possibly-gay fantasy situations, he would still look a little too scary/weird/frightening (take your pick), while someone like Mark Eaton, Tom Chambers or Hot Plate Williams could make it work. You know what I mean?

November 14, 2006

Topps Makes Me Bitter:
Allen & Ginter Edition

I can’t afford packs of Topps’ new Allen & Ginter, I have no desire to complete the set and I don’t really understand Topps’ new policy of including non-baseball players in its base sets (like the supermodels in the 1952 Style basketball set). But that doesn’t mean I don’t like the cards. The design is fantastic: clean, smooth, no overbearing Topps logo on the front of the card, and best of all, it’s printed without gloss on quality card stock. Just a real nice-looking set.

I was able to pick up a few of the cards at the Holy Cross show on West 43rd on Saturday, including this one of Chester A. Arthur. I’m not a historian, but I do know that Arthur was one of the most corrupt politicians of the late Nineteenth Century, a time known for its corrupt politicians. So why did Topps include Arthur in this set? Why couldn’t they include a card of James Garfield instead? Why did they shy from teaching kids about Charles Guiteau (and the horrors incompetent doctors wrought in the face of a gunshot wound) and instead focus on luminaries like Arthur and Ruthe-fraud B. Hayes? I honestly don’t understand. I mean, there was plenty of room in the set. They could’ve left in the other late century presidents and not include a card of competitive eater Takeru Kobayashi, shown in deep concentration as he chokes down an unnumbered hot dog.

Ah, who am I kidding? Cards of competitive eaters, spelling bee champs and supermodels sell cards. I guess if I wanted cards of important historical stuff I could buy old Flags of the World commons. At least I can afford them.

November 13, 2006

Today I Wonder If Frank Riccelli Lives Near the Crispin Porter + Bogusky Office, Because He Looks A Helluva Lot Like The Creepy Burger King Mascot

The title of this post says it all. It has to be just a coincidence that Riccelli strikes an uncanny similarity to Bogusky’s interpretation of ‘The King’.

Which brings up an important point: if you can't remember what you did the night before and you wake up to find Riccelli in your bed offering you a sausage and egg biscuit with a maniacal shit-eating grin, try not to be too obvious in your dialing of the cops—I bet he can smell fear. I mean, he did have a pretty formidable ERA in the International League at Charleston in 1978 (2.78).

November 12, 2006

Branching Out

I’ve been telling myself that someday I’ll look back on my time in New York City with the fondness and nostalgia that living in a different location usually brings, and that I will wish that I had used my time here to the fullest. Therefore, I decided to do a very New York thing and took in a show yesterday. Granted, it was early Saturday morning, I was in a dilapidated Catholic grammar school gymnasium and surrounded by a crowd of middle-aged men ogling Ryan Howard rookies and game-used inserts. But I had paid admission ($1), plus I ended up spending $30 for cards I didn’t know I wanted, and I had a pretty good time in the process.

I spent most of the morning talking with Mel, who described himself as more of a collector than a dealer. We agreed that there wasn’t much point in collecting new cards in terms of “making an investment” (his words), and his advice was that if you really wanted to make money, you shouldn’t purchase anything after 1969. And I had to agree with him on principle, but luckily I’m not at a point in my habit where I’m concerned with making an investment. I’m more concerned with owning the card, regardless of its condition. And when it comes to buying cards in not-so-great condition, well, Mel’s your man.

Like this killer card of Rod Carew sporting a wicked early-1980s headband. Let me tell you something, I always thought I had appreciated the headband, but after yesterday I now know that you can’t just wear a headband and automatically look like the Baumer from Royal Tenenbaums. No, the headband is not something that can be idly mastered—practice is key. Plus, there are a few things that you must take into consideration before you even attempt to wear one. First, the thickness of the band. Second, the thickness of your hair. Third, the color of the band in relation to the color of your uniform. Based on these principles, it’s obvious that where Rod Carew succeeds with quiet aplomb, Sidney Wicks fails miserably. Carew’s fro-to-band ratio is well proportioned, while Wicks’ hair looks like an extension of the band. You can see Wicks’ discomfort in his eyes—he knows he isn’t practiced enough to be photographed.

Or these cards of Spider Lockhart and Chuck Muncie, who, by the way, is quickly becoming my favorite retired NFL player. All of his cards seem to picture him on the sidelines, sitting on the bench, or in various other places but never on the field. Plus he wears hornrims and has a scholarly mustache/goatee thing going. I almost expect him to teach college-level physics in the off-season. This Lockhart card from ’75 is great because it’s pre-universal Gatorade squeeze bottle. I bet he brought that plastic jug from home.

I got some other great cards too. Like this one of Kenesaw Landis from Fleer’s Baseball Greats series from 1961. And if you ever want to read a few stories about Landis that conflict with his hard-line legacy as Commissioner, read the first few chapters of Leo Durocher’s Nices Guys Finish Last. Apparently he was a real softy when it came to players’ rights.

But perhaps the best card I got at the show was this Julius Erving Super Action card from the terribly underrated (and personal favorite) 1981-82 Topps basketball set. Not only is Erving skying high while he drives to the basket, but he’s doing so in the old Garden, with McHale and Bird looking on. It’s just an awesome shot, and one that’s got me thinking…

Now that baseball’s done for the year, I think I’ll start including some basketball-related stuff on the blog. Wouldn’t be bad, right? I mean, I’m not talking about a ton of World B. Free and Slick Watts references, but after listening to classic Tommy Heinsohn commentary during a playoff game against the Hawks about how overweight Ray Williams was (on the Larry Bird’s Greatest Hits dvd), I thought it might be nice to branch out a little bit. Try new things. Use this space to its fullest. That kind of thing.

November 10, 2006

Quick Note On Trying to Race a Horse

Were those doctors ever able to fix Barbaro’s leg? Sometimes I wonder what Sparky told the Tigers in 1984 that boosted them over the top…or was it something more? Because I’ve never thought it was a good idea for a man to enter himself in horse races (and then to be considered the favorite—he must have been doping!).

What has Garbey been doing all these years since he retired? Judging from the way he performed in The Kentucky Derby this year, I’d say he’s been doing a lot of bulking up and early-morning wind sprints, and not so much grazing, as retired ballplayers are wont to do. But then, when he got hurt in the Preakness, well, it makes you think, you know? Like maybe entering yourself in high-stakes horse races—not as some kind of joke, but as a real thing that you’re going to carry through—is not such a great idea.

November 09, 2006

My Favorite Subset, 1981:
Donruss Manager Cards

I am a man of my favorites. That’s why it’s easy for me to appreciate the manager cards from 1981 Donruss: the stark simplicity of what is, in essence, a headshot or a blurry medium shot of an old man is rendered both wonderful and painfully boring. The other years when Donruss put out manager cards, the company thought it necessary to include them within the scope of ‘regular’ cards: posed shots in the dugout to simulate a game setting or else an actual in-game photo. But by doing so, the company stripped the managers subset of the very thing that made the original subset so appealing: the fact that these guys could actually pass for your grandfather, portrayed in ways not far removed from those in which you’d seen your grandfather photographed. Sure, you’re grandfather probably didn’t dress up in a Cleveland Indians uniform, but like Dave Garcia, he probably used a cane, and he did have an honest look about him (that is a cane that Garcia is resting his hands on, right?).

And if not your grandfather, then at least one of your no-good good ole boy uncles, like John Goryl. He looks like he just got bailed out of jail, or at least like he just got slapped across the face. And if not a good ole boy uncle, then definitely an unpleasant guy who makes your life unpleasant in some way, whether he’s a traffic cop, a boss or a high school principal. And really, all that’s missing from Dave Bristol’s forehead is ‘Dork’ spelled out in suntan lotion (much like Captain Harris’ misguided day in the sun from the immortal Police Academy 5: Mission Miami Beach). Seriously, where does Bristol’s Giants jersey end and his face begin?

And how can we forget Jim Frey? I bet the Donruss photographer found this photo after rummaging through the trash at Frey’s local post office, because it’s obviously an unused passport photo—the background gives it away.

Overall, the uniform colors are great, the skin tones horrible, and many if not all of the managers are photographed up against some kind of wall. The only exception I can think of is Joe Amalfitano’s card where it looks as though he was photographed leaving the Cubs’ team bus on the highway to take a piss.

November 08, 2006

Appreciation: Cinematic Cards from 1991

There’s no denying it: 1991 was a horrible year for cards. And it was one of the worst of the decade, right behind 1990 in terms of bad design across the board. It was the first year when there really were too many sets, when the idea of a ‘premium’ set, established in 1989 with the introduction of Upper Deck, became widespread to a point where it seemed like every set had a premium aspect to it. Inserts were becoming a big deal and pack pricing would soon blast through the roof. In other words, the landscape of 1991 was really the last straw for many collectors, and probably the year I should’ve stopped collecting (and if it weren’t for my obsessive nature, I probably would’ve, too).

But for all this doom and gloom the changed atmosphere (one of increased competition for share of voice and for collector dollar) did wonders for the individual quality of the cards. Topps, not known for stellar photography, busted out some definitely cinematic poses for the 1991 base set. Take this one of Benny Santiago (and by the way, when did he go from ‘Benito’ to ‘Benny’?): not only is the lighting just right, but the photographer is definitely using a crane for the shot, in an effort to dramatize Santiago going after a pop foul, from the pov of the ball. Kind of weird, when you think about it, but definitely more dramatic than another shot of Santiago in the dugout picking his nose.

Score, unlike Topps, did not have to include grand, sweeping photography in its base set in order to do battle with the company’s newly launched premium brand (that would come in 1992 with the stellar Pinnacle set): they had to do it to stay in the running against the ten or so competing sets. Also unlike Topps, Score’s 1990 set featured great, show-stopping photography on a few choice cards, set pieces if you will. Of course I’m talking about the Bo Jackson in pads card, but there was also the Bo Jackson All-Star Game card as well as the Highlights cards of Ryan and Boggs. Then there were the artist’s-rendition-from-a-photo Dream Team cards that were very much like Diamond Kings only way cooler, seeing as how there were less of them. Anyway, I’m rambling here, but the point is that Score had more to draw from than Topps in terms of how to do a show-stopping set piece card. Topps knew only to rely on sweeping photography; Score knew that there would have to be a gimmick attached as well. That’s why the Bob Welch card from the 1991 set works. Sure, Welch won 27 games and wasn’t considered the top starter that year on the team (Dave Stewart was), and sure, his win-total outburst was more career aberration than anything else, but the guy did win the Cy Young, his team did make the World Series and he did have a pretty great season, statistics-wise. So how does Score celebrate his achievement? With a card that graphically summarizes his season: a simple black-and-white photograph of his signature pitch, the split-finger fastball. In a word, it’s classy. More so than, say, the Bo Breaker card, which was derivative of the 1990 Jackson set piece, and which I’ve written about before.

As a third example, take a look at the Fernando Valenzuela card from the 1991 Upper Deck set (#175). It’s trademark Upper Deck, in that it features an awesome three-picture photo of the dynamic Valenzuela wind-up. The three-photo card was an original UD idea that was as much a brand signifier as it was a gimmick, and just by looking at it you knew what Upper Deck stood for as a card company: great quality, irreverent presentation. In essence, a premium brand that cared fuck-all about the other companies, because once collectors got a taste of the Upper Deck product, there wouldn’t be any more competition. It took the hobby a little while to come to this conclusion, but here we are. Industry insiders and historians will tell you that the success of Upper Deck can be laid on the shoulders of many decisions, from including autographed cards as inserts to leading off with the Griffey rookie as card #1 in 1989, but they’d be amiss if they didn’t mention that by using cinematic photography on nearly every card, and especially the three-photo card, customers moved past ‘collectors’ to ‘loyal following’ the moment they opened a pack.

November 07, 2006

Wallet Worthy: 1959 Topps #431
Whammy Douglas

I’d like to inaugurate a new classification of card: Wallet Worthy. I’d been thinking about the demise of Tower Records and how with the impending death of compact discs comes the impending death of liner notes. And with the death of liner notes comes the death of the obscure reference. And this is something that must not come to pass. Tower Records also got me thinking about the idea of desert island discs: you know, the ten or so records you’d take with you if you were stranded on a desert isle. My idea was, could you do the same thing with cards? Could you really make a list of desert island cards and get away with it? I decided you could do it, but you’d have to change the situation and the name. Instead of the age-old question: If you were stranded on a desert island with only ten baseball cards, what would they be?, I came up with: If you were slowly getting drunk at an airport bar, what cards would you produce from the photofold in your wallet (you know, where photos of your wife, kid, grandparent, grandchildren are supposed to be) to brag about with anyone who’ll listen?

The more I thought about it, the larger my proverbial photofold became. But to start things off, Whammy Douglas’ black-bordered binocular framed card from 1959 is definitely wallet worthy. First of all, his name is ‘Whammy’. Second, it’s a poorly-cut copy of the card. Third, it’s got a black border and he’s on the Redlegs, which means the colors used on the front are totally kick-ass. Fourth, did I mention his name is ‘Whammy’?, and that the blurb on the back says he’s especially proud of the home run he hit in Spring Training for the Reds in 1958? So does that mean that this is the first mention of his nickname? If that’s true, then this could be on par with Spiderman No. 1 or some other kind of comic book hero introduction, and who wouldn’t want something that in their wallet to brag about? Also, did you notice all the stains, scratches and wear and tear on the front of the card? It’s like the card is begging you--begging--to be jammed into a wallet, unlike, say, Gaylord Perry’s #115 from 1982 Topps (unless, of course, you have a thing for older men. Perry looks like he’s either posing for a dust jacket photo or he’s secretly Spalding Gray’s older brother…by the way, how great would it have been if Gaylord Perry became a famous author after he retired? Or instead of ‘famous author’, if he became a mediocre harlequin romance novel writer? That would’ve been unbelievably funny, but still not wallet worthy.)

November 06, 2006

Today I Breathe a Sigh of Relief For:
Hoyt Wilhelm & His Exposed Trade Secrets

Name me five long-lasting, successful knuckleball pitchers. I’ll even spot you three: Phil Niekro, Tim Wakefield and Hoyt Wilhelm. It’s hard, right? So then how do you think a guy like Wilhelm felt to have the Topps photographers ask for him to make the knuckleball pose almost every year? Isn’t that like giving away a trade secret? And what if this had fallen into the wrong hands? What if an obsessed hitter spent the off-season dissecting his grip and then showed up in April and blasted the hell out of the ball whenever they faced? I would say that Wilhelm’s considerable talent would’ve been severely compromised.

And it’s not like he’s unwilling to showcase the nifty pitch—he’s smiling or at least looking into the distance optimistically in the examples shown. Wilhelm lasted a hell of a long time in the majors, so if anyone ever figured him out, he probably outlasted them. In the card to the right (1965 Topps #276) he’s 43, right in his prime as the Sox’ ace reliever. So here’s to you Hoyt. Today I breathe a sigh of relief for you.

November 05, 2006

Appreciation: 1982 Fleer #608 Danny Ainge

I’ve been gearing up lately for the start of the NBA season, mostly by watching the hand-picked greatest games of Larry Bird on a 2-disc DVD I bought for my dad a few Christmases ago. In all three games Bird does some amazing things, but it’s really not Bird that makes the games electric. He was a brilliant player, don’t get me wrong, and I was at one of the games on the DVD and he was amazing. But it’s the whole atmosphere that excites me: the Boston Garden; the old Hawks teams with Rivers, Wilkins, Willis, Webb, Antoine Carr and Randy Wittman; Tommy Heinsohn in the booth for CBS trying very hard to remain neutral in his commentary; and the other Celtics players and how despite them not having much of a bench after McHale, how good they were. Four out of the five starters on the 1985-6 Celtics are in the Hall of Fame (or should be) and the fifth player is none other than the weak-hitting third baseman for the Toronto Blue Jays, Danny Ainge.

So what if Red Auerbach had never gone to court and Ainge never ended up in a Celtics uniform? Who would’ve been the starting shooting guard for those classic Celtics teams? My guess is Auerbach would’ve somehow landed Ricky Pierce, Dale Ellis or Eddie Johnson (who was available when the Celts drafted at #23 in the 1981 draft).

No Ainge means no trade with the Kings at the end of the 1980s, and no trade with the Kings means no Ed Pinckney and no Joe Kleine, which means no frontcourt support for the ailing Bird, McHale and Parish. And no frontcourt support for the Big Three means having to rely on great draft-day decision making and orchestrating lopsided trades, both of which were not the Celtics’ strong suits at the time. So without Ainge (and not being able to determine who would’ve filled his spot), it’s fair to say that the Celtics would’ve fallen apart a lot faster than they actually did. And what does it say about the Celtics’ front office situation today? No Ainge just means more M.L. Carr, or worse, Rick Pitino.

So here’s to you, Danny Ainge. Thanks for a lifetime batting average that’s barely over the Mendoza Line. And all those timely three-pointers.

November 04, 2006

Today I Feel Sorry For:
Lonely Paul Molitor, circa 1981

Molitor looks so sad all by himself. And why is the photographer so far away from him? Did he want to prove that the young Brewer actually had legs? Also, this is one of the few posed cards I’ve seen where there are fans in the stands behind the posed player. I’m guessing that one of three things happened: a Topps rival bribed ballpark security to give the Donruss photographer a hard time, he was running late or Gorman Thomas demanded thirty-five shots be taken of him in various positions, pushing sad-sack Molitor’s time down to just thirty seconds before game time.

Or maybe Molitor wanted a shot of him with his entire extended family in it, so that’s why there are people in the stands. I just don’t know. But something’s definitely not right with this card.

November 03, 2006

The Best of The Baseball Card Blog

As a quick update to the site, we've added a quick little internal link list down on the right hand side of the page: The Best of the Blog. Here you'll find links to 12 of the most popular (or possibly best-written) entries on the site. We're working on a way for quick access to the Best Set of the 1980s Countdown, but for now you can access it through the link to the entry about 1987 Topps (#1 on the Countdown).

We hope you enjoy this new feature.

November 02, 2006

Appreciation: 1992 Topps
#646 Craig Wilson

I was not very cool in high school. To illustrate this claim, one spring break I spent 10 hours a day for three days straight learning how to juggle. I developed a respect for Michael Moschen, I made my own juggling balls out of balloons and sand and hoped that one day I could shop at Brian Dubé in New York. I started by learning a simple three-ball cascade, then moved to passing one over two, then over time taught myself a simple claw cascade, then Mill’s Mess, then claw Mill’s, then half-claw Mill’s, then half-claw Brook’s Barrage, then I moved on to creating my own patterns and now, almost twelve years later, I find I sometimes go three or four months without juggling and then can just start without thinking anything of it. It’s very much like riding a bicycle.

So then, you’d think with all my background in the art and sport of it I’d be able to figure out what exactly Craig Wilson is doing in this picture. It’s my guess that it’s some kind of three-ball shower. Either that or a two-ball pattern in his right hand while his left holds the third ball in a follow up-down pattern. In any case, it’s impressive for a few reasons: one, he’s on a crowded bench in the dugout; there’s someone right next to him. Two, it means he can concentrate better than the average baseball player. I’m not inferring that Wilson was a brilliant ballplayer--he would’ve made it off the bench more often if he had been.

November 01, 2006

Appreciation: The Cult of Jerome Walton

This card is a sweepstakes card from a pack of 1990 Bowman. The text on back reads “Did you know…that the picture on the other side of this card is a reproduction of a painting of Jerome Walton that is part of a set of 11 paintings of superstar players by artist Craig Pursley? Do you know that this set of 11 artist-signed and numbered lithos has a value in excess of $440.00?”

Can you imagine if you won one of these sets in the sweepstakes in 1990, thinking that you’d be able to retire in ten years after the value shot through the roof? Here’s the complete checklist for the lithograph set: Kevin Mitchell, Jerome Walton, Mark Davis, Robin Yount, Gregg Olson, Bret Saberhagen, Bo Jackson, Nolan Ryan, Will Clark, Don Mattingly, Dwight Gooden. I’m speechless. The highlight of the set is obviously still the Jerome Walton, if only because the other players were all marginally successful for longer periods of time. In fact, I can’t think of anyone in the history of sports I’d rather have a signed lithograph of than Jerome Walton.