Showing posts with label NBA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NBA. Show all posts

January 08, 2015

NBA History, Sans Michael Jordan

What if you had to present the history of the NBA without mentioning Michael Jordan? Fans of basketball know that to even suggest something so ludicrous is, well, ludicrous. And yet, if you're Panini, you have an exclusive license to produce official NBA cards and the sport's number-one-all-time star is under contract with a competitor.

It's unfortunate, to say the least. For the 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons, Panini produced a very cool throwback set called Past & Present, featuring stars and rookies of today with Hall of Famers and stars from the past. Yes, there were other big—really big, in a few cases—stars missing from the checklists, but none bigger than Michael Jordan. 

Yes, Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, LeBron James and Dwyane Wade, Tim Duncan and Kevin Garnett, Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe Bryant, all are represented. Even a few nice rookies, including the unibrowed rebound monster Anthony Davis. But it's not like you don't notice. It's obvious Jordan's not on the checklist.

Despite his absence, Past & Present is the kind of set I would create if I worked at a card company. Vintage look and feel to the base set, a nice mix of designs and a diverse checklist (of course I would've found a way to include cards of Dan Issel, Dave Cowens, Earl Monroe, Rudy Tomjanovich, Shawn Kemp, Kevin Johnson, Gus Williams, Kevin McHale, and, oh, I don't know, Charles Barkley). 

Another highlight is that, much like Topps's football and baseball Archives products, both years of Past & Present are relatively inexpensive to collect. Packs and boxes are still available on discount wholesale websites, and hand-collated sets can be found on eBay (if you search long enough). Another similarity to Topps Archives? One of the 2012-13 chase sets is comprised of autographs of obscure, retired players as well as current stars. Guys like Rick Fox, J.R. Rider, and even a recently deceased former player (Ray Williams).

All in all, nice cards—great designs and an excellent mix of old and new stars. And if you can get past the fact that Jordan isn't walking through that door, you've got yourself a winner.

June 28, 2013

What Ben's Thinking About

It's no secret: my interest in collecting sports cards waxes and wanes like the cycles of the moon. But there are certain things about the hobby that pique my interest. Here they are for the week of June 29, 2013. 

1. I just inherited a baseball that my grandfather caught at a Washington Senators game back in 1960, and it got me thinking...Has there ever been a foul ball set? As in, a checklist of relic cards composed entirely of pieces of game-caught foul and home run balls? It could be a fairly interesting set, especially if some of the pieces are historic.

2. The "Umpire Archives" set is one step further to reality — I've created a 100-card checklist consisting of notable major league baseball umpires and NBA, NFL, and NHL referees. Plus a few subsets, including "Ejection Heroes" like Earl Weaver, Bobby Cox, and Rasheed Wallace.

3. It's too bad there hasn't been an all-time team concept set for professional basketball. I'm thinking a 400-or-so card set featuring the 12 best players on each NBA team and 40 players from the ABA. One caveat: Players can only be represented on one team, which would be especially interesting for players who excelled on multiple teams. So Garnett would be on the T-Wolves, Julius Erving on the ABA's NY Nets, and LeBron James probably on the Cleveland Cavaliers, as he was their whole team for seven seasons.

4. I'd like to see other major league baseball teams follow the Chicago Cubs and do team-specific Topps Archives sets as game giveaways.

5. Just wondering if there are any card-collecting nerds out there in the world of professional sports. Every so often you hear about one, be it Pat Neshek of the Minnesota Twins or retired slugger Dmitri Young. Today's young rookies would've been 8 years old anywhere between 1998 and 2002...Were those good years for collecting? My interest hadn't been rekindled at that point. But what I mean is, if those weren't good years for collecting, it would follow that younger players with disposable income wouldn't have as great a nostalgia for baseball cards, but for things like Playstation 2 or something like that instead.

6. I'd love for Topps to put out a "golden ticket" sweepstakes for a trip to the Topps factory. I'm thinking a guided tour, a special set of cards, or a whole sheet of cards or something. As marketing for the sweepstakes, they could do a series of short Web videos where crazy things happen at the Topps factory. I'd watch it, and probably make it past the second episode, which is more than I can say for the weird misguided Sklar brothers Webisodes of "Back on Topps."

7. I have a sneaking suspicion that as long as they have an exclusive license for Major League Baseball, we won't see truly original work from Topps. Oh sure, there will be retro sets like Heritage, Archives, Gypsy Queen, and Allen & Ginter, and sets aimed at all strata and price points. But how about a flagship design that doesn't have a white border? I know, I know, I sound like a broken record. But those one-offs, those weird-o sets that maybe didn't have an obvious demographic (Topps Kids, I'm thinking of you), those were sets that were allowed to push the envelope. If MLB is going to be an exclusively licensed property, at least make the sets worthwhile. 

8. What if Topps did a Jell-O set? Or a cereal-box set? Or tie bags of M&M's into it somehow? I want to see baseball cards push their way into mainstream consumerism again.

9. Am I the only one waiting for a Shorin family member to write a tell-all about the Topps sale back in 2007?

10. Idea for a coffee-table photography book: sports players' outrageous and sublime tattoos.

July 21, 2008

The OKC Thunder: What, "Slick Watts and The Happy Head Band" Was Taken?


Man. Who totally called it that the new Oklahoma City basketball team name was going to be something to do with a force of nature? And here's what stinks about this new name: It has to be included in any sort of logo for the team. What I mean is, the great logos of the NBA can stand on their own without mention of the team name: Celtics, Bulls, Heat, Spurs, the old San Francisco Warriors. There are others that I'm forgetting. But how exactly do you graphically represent something as fleeting as thunder without including the name in the logo?

Why couldn't the team just use the old Entertaining Comics logo, swapping out the 'E' for an 'OK'?

Here's the other thing that stinks about this name: Something tells me their 'secret motivating cheer' will be called the 'thunderclap' and their 'super-double-secret motivational device' will look a lot like those ridiculous thunderstix, otherwise known as vertical balloons.

Here's one, last, final, I-promise-to-drop-the-subject, alternate team name: The Oklahoma City Follies. Even though it would be used to its fullest extent by the press, the name harks back to the state's most prestigious humorist, Will Rogers. And the team will be laughable enough. Why not make it official?

July 03, 2008

SuperSonics RIP



As has been reported, part of the restitution the Sonics' ownership must pay to the city of Seattle is that the SuperSonics name and team colors must stay with the city (possibly in case of future expansion?). So that leads to the inevitable question of what to call the new outfit in Oklahoma City.

No doubt the ownership's already employing an ad agency, public relations firm, brand manager, and local point person to start coming up with names, but here are a few that could work:

Okies
Tumbleweeds
89ers


What will probably happen is one of three things:

1. The team chooses an historically-important team name
2. The team chooses a word in Choctaw that has something to do with the force of nature
3. The team chooses a name like Eagles

I'm hoping they go for Kevin Durant and the Singing Cowboys.