tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post9001222162793084720..comments2024-03-20T04:07:19.586-04:00Comments on The Baseball Card Blog: Countdown #42: 1974 Toppsjosh Muellerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10212453263195870177noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-20073981718845623322016-06-20T23:59:01.819-04:002016-06-20T23:59:01.819-04:00Speaking of 1974 Topps' "errors"... ...Speaking of 1974 Topps' "errors"... I've got a JOE HOERNER w/ a DAVID WINFIELD back! A gem/mint to boot! Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03039557056772715333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-44085319793385629472011-08-11T21:54:56.482-04:002011-08-11T21:54:56.482-04:00Speaking of '74 errors, I'm surprised no o...Speaking of '74 errors, I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Winfield with the wrong player stats on the back (Joe Hoerner). My understanding is there is no "Washington" Winfield card, just the error mentioned above.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-74415267082596451072010-09-05T00:08:01.399-04:002010-09-05T00:08:01.399-04:00Greetings!
I recently started a 1974 Topps blog, ...Greetings!<br /><br />I recently started a 1974 Topps blog, my most collected set of my childhood. I agree with you that it ain't pretty and has fewer features, fewer rookie stars, etc. It's unfortunate, but it's still "my baby." It makes me appreciate other years much more.<br /><br />http://1974topps.blogspot.comSteve Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10297044571819912511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-62796473094556049322009-10-04T15:10:03.013-04:002009-10-04T15:10:03.013-04:00Beckett Price Guide issued a cut-out in the early ...Beckett Price Guide issued a cut-out in the early '90s of what the Winfield Washington NL would have looked like.<br /><br />I've always had a fondess for this set, of all the '70s sets. It's got a lot of HOFers, even if they aren't rookie cards, the design is clean and you get a traded set, which wouldn't happen again until 1982. I agree with you about 1960 being one of the best Topps ever did, but 1974 is one I never tire of looking at.Brian Chidesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17080750556351043029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-71613320321637689872008-07-23T16:59:00.000-04:002008-07-23T16:59:00.000-04:00"My brother had a Dave Winfield Washington NL card..."My brother had a Dave Winfield Washington NL card, but being a young kid, he wrote San Diego over the Washington."<BR/><BR/>There isn't a Dave Winfield Washington NL error variation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-19440311029541747632008-01-26T02:28:00.000-05:002008-01-26T02:28:00.000-05:00Great column. I agree with the other guy that you...Great column. I agree with the other guy that you should add something about the Wash. variations. The Dave Freiselwhatever San Diego versions make his rookie card very valuable to error colectors. Oh, and that Jim Rice card you pictured is an '80, not a '74. It's the flags on the cards that throw ya.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-84772907265021311012007-04-12T16:45:00.000-04:002007-04-12T16:45:00.000-04:00My brother had a Dave Winfield Washington NL card,...My brother had a Dave Winfield Washington NL card, but being a young kid, he wrote San Diego over the Washington. Doh!!!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20684429.post-84847522850032391912007-02-18T08:48:00.000-05:002007-02-18T08:48:00.000-05:00What about the Washington NL's cards? I'm surprise...What about the Washington NL's cards? I'm surprised to see a write-up on th 1974 set without some mention of this major screw-up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com